andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2008-12-06 12:38 am
Late to the party
We went to see Quantum of Solace. It was.....alright.
The worldbuilding was nice (as
laserboy pointed out) - but the actual plot felt like it was on fast-forward, covering two movies worth of infodump in one movie, without any depth or real characterisation.
A lack of depth and characterisation would not, of course, have been a problem with any previous Bond movie, but this one seemed to be priding itself on being more 'real' - but sadly fell short of the Bourne movies in that respect, leaving it falling somewhat uncomfortably between two stools.
Not bad, by any means, but it felt like it could have done with someone taking a step back and looking at it from a distance, to make sure it actually worked as a movie, and not just as a series of scenes that followed a plot.
The worldbuilding was nice (as
A lack of depth and characterisation would not, of course, have been a problem with any previous Bond movie, but this one seemed to be priding itself on being more 'real' - but sadly fell short of the Bourne movies in that respect, leaving it falling somewhat uncomfortably between two stools.
Not bad, by any means, but it felt like it could have done with someone taking a step back and looking at it from a distance, to make sure it actually worked as a movie, and not just as a series of scenes that followed a plot.
no subject
no subject
I've been percolating something in my head about how revenge is stopping either of the two leads from moving on and having character development - but I need to process it some more before I write about it.
I think I was also unimpressed by the action scenes, which didn't help.
no subject
As for the action scenes, they were very different to previous bond films, and personally I loved the low key Casino Royale to the explosive Quantum of Solace, but still the opera scene was quite well done.
no subject