andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2008-11-27 03:30 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Delicious LiveJournal Links for 11-27-2008
-
Speaking from his hotel room, a British businessman, who did not want to be named for security reasons, told BBC News he had pushed the furniture against the door for protection. He said he had heard gunshots, blasts and people running along the corridors throughout the night. "It's not the most pleasant of experiences," he said. "I suppose it's a question of British stiff upper lip."
-
Exactly the kind of article that should lead to bad journalists being rounded up and shot.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I thought the point of blogs was that you are allowed to be randomly opinionated and frivolous.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I don't take everything I read I the Guardian as being true. It's not meant to be. It's an insult to proper Guardian readers to suggest that we can't make the distinction. If you want to read the Independent or Times or whatever, go read the Independent or Times or Whatever.
no subject
I am no longer an angry, precocious twenty year old. I have outgrown the Guardian. This saddens me, but I feel it's something I have to come to terms with.
I read the Independent the other day. It felt a little like a rite of passage.
Edit: I should add that I still enjoy the Guardian in a good writing, interesting columns kind of way. I just don't really regard it as a newspaper any more. More of a sort of slightly higher-brow magazine that gossips about politicians and the economy instead of celebrities' boob jobs. Mostly.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Go on tell me!
no subject
I meant the one about about young men who aren't liberal having no heart, and old men who aren't conservatives having no brain.
Although I guess as a chick I get to do as I please...
(But I'll never read the Daily Mail)
no subject
Not actually Churchill: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Winston_Churchill#Misattributed
no subject
no subject
Not actually Churchill: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Winston_Churchill#Misattributed
(I disagree, of course.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
Wow. What a stunningly crap article. Luckily it has already been thoroughly blasted by EVERY SINGLE POSTER on it's on message thread. :)
no subject
*eye roll*