andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2003-01-17 12:18 am

And the days go by like snowflakes

Took today off work to take Erin to get laser eye surgery done. She was stressed and tense, so we ended up having a minor argument when my attempt to cheer her up backfired. We went through to Glasgow, met up with a photographer (because she got the Sunday Herald to pay her to write an article about it) and were all set when they decided to do one last test.

Which showed that her cornea is too thin for the operation to be safe. So she can't have it done. Ever.

She's been looking forward to this for as long as I've known her, and they just whisked it away from under her feet in 30 seconds.

She held it together while the photographer left, and then we went into the toilet and she cried on my shoulder for about 5 minutes and pulled herself back together.

Needless to say she was then miserable for a couple of hours, before ushering me out the door so that she could get drunk with Andrew (an old friend of hers). I was ushered off to gaming because I don't actually drink hardly at all and have a tendency towards disapproving looks towards drunk people. A tendency I've tried to rid myself of with little success.

So I went over to Hugh's and gamed for a bit, which was very good fun. I'm still very unsure about the world we're gaming in. Our behaviour feels very locked down, to the point where I feel like I'm going to have to do a load more reading before I can act in a character and stay within the code of honour (it's Legend of the 5 Rings, set in Rokugan which is taken heavily from feudal Japan)

And now I'm off to bed. And I hope tomorrow is a better day than the morning and half as good as the evening.

I'd be happy with that.

[identity profile] rollick.livejournal.com 2003-01-16 04:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm sorry about Erin's disappointment, but I really wouldn't take the surgeons' opinion as gospel and permanent.

About three years after contact lenses became relatively standard, I went to my optometrist and was checked to see if contacts would suit me. He told me that because I had a minor astigmatism in addition to being nearsighted, no contact lenses would address my vision problems, and that I was definitely going to be stuck wearing glasses for the rest of my life.

A year later, I was wearing contacts that corrected the problem just fine.

Rule #1: Any definitive statement of "X will NEVER happen" should be taken with a huge boulder of salt. I bet 9.5 out of 10 optometrists, if asked 10 years ago whether it would someday be possible to correct people's vision by "editing" their corneas with a laser beam, would have said "Of course not. That would be incredibly dangerous. And no one would choose to have that done."

Rule #2: The state of the art is constantly changing. Myself, I'm not having my eyes fixed because I still consider the process too new; we haven't yet seen the long-term health problems associated with it. But within a couple of years, I'll probably consider it safe, because the technology is advancing so quickly. It's entirely possible that in the foreseeable future, there will either be finer lasers capable of dealing with thinner corneas, or, who knows, maybe a cornea-thickening medical regimen. Stranger things have happened.

So yes, it's a huge blow now (and an annoying professional setback, I would think) but it's not necessarily forever.

[identity profile] kpollock.livejournal.com 2003-01-17 04:05 am (UTC)(link)
Sorry to hear that, but a other folks say - wait and see - technology advances all the time.

[identity profile] onceupon.livejournal.com 2003-01-16 05:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Tell Erin I'm awfully sorry. It's terrible to be denied something when it is just in your grasp.
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] drainboy.livejournal.com 2003-01-17 02:33 am (UTC)(link)
Change your mind. Report them.
Anyone who posts randomly with links that end up with me having to click no to a query box asking do I "always want to trust content from Gator corporation" deserves everything they get.

[identity profile] rollick.livejournal.com 2003-01-17 07:31 am (UTC)(link)
A MOMENT of stupid overenthusiasm? If this stupid link works the same way as the other stupid links of its genre, s/he's fooled 709 people this way. I suspect that took more than a moment; s/he's probably spamming everyone in sight.

It's absolutely beyond me why it would be worth annoying 709 people in order to make a counter on a web page somewhere display a higher number. That just goes beyond arrogance and well into infantilism.

[identity profile] rollick.livejournal.com 2003-01-17 10:41 am (UTC)(link)
Heh. I just checked out its journal. Personally, I don't think banning it would be any great loss to the world. Check out its "poetry." Or the way it's posted that same link over and over and over under different guises.

[identity profile] rollick.livejournal.com 2003-01-17 07:32 am (UTC)(link)
i am funny!

No, you're an insensitive, selfish twit. There's a difference.

[identity profile] broin.livejournal.com 2003-01-17 03:47 am (UTC)(link)
Ack. Sorry to hear that.

Time to take a holiday?

(Anonymous) 2003-01-17 08:54 am (UTC)(link)
What kind of laser eye surgery was Erin going for? This site (http://www.optimaxuk.co.uk/laser_eye_surgery/lasik_or_lasek.html) says that you can have LASEK (doesn't involve cutting, but longer recovery time) if your cornea is too thin for LASIK (the generally preferred method for stronger prescriptions). So there might already be an option open to her.