andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2008-02-18 10:57 pm

Because sometimes you have to know these things

In response to my previous post, [livejournal.com profile] octopoid_horror posted a link.
He mentioned that there were no photos until the very end - and even then you have to click on the links, so you can't see anything by accident. Up until that point it's just text.

It turned out I'd read the article before, but was unable to resist the urge to read it all again.

I didn't, however, click on the links. You'd have to pay me quite a lot of money to make me do that.

Which has me wondering what kind of threshholds other people have...
[Poll #1140566]

[identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
It is worth noting that the link is amazing due to the demonstration of just what money can buy you.

It's actually the story that intrigued me - that people on the forum gave money, then thought "oh, we have been scammed!" and then the reality hit, and there was even the noticeboard with SA slogans in the background of the video!

[identity profile] drjon.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)
You linked directly to Page 4, you sick fcuk. ;}P>

Um. People eating poo. I hope they got paid well. People eat worse things. Meh.

[identity profile] accordingly.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Dude, I am a child of the internet generation. I have actually watched swap.avi, I've made a 2 girls 1 cup reaction video, I've seen the pain series countless times and browsed rotten.com from the age of 14: nothing fazes me these days. I'm completely desensitized. Which is quite disturbing, come to think of it.

{Not to say that nothing affects me, war images and such do. Obviously I'm not completely dead inside yet...}

[identity profile] seph-hazard.livejournal.com 2008-02-18 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)
I went straight through, without reading. I clicked on all the links. "Ahh well", I thought. "Whatever turns you on".

Then I read the text. Page four of the text, the description of the film, actually made me gag, despite the fact that the stills had provoked no reaction.

I wonder what that says about me?

[identity profile] surliminal.livejournal.com 2008-02-19 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
But I stopped cos I got bored!

[identity profile] captainlucy.livejournal.com 2008-02-19 12:10 am (UTC)(link)
Is it bad that I was reading page 4 and (very quietly) laughing my tits off? Obviously not at what was being described, but rather the way it was being described. Gems such as "...like mother birds that have absent-mindedly built their nests in the skim tanks of a waste treatment plant" or "...Their simian brains are insufficient for the task of comprehending their transgressions against Odin. I want to dash their heads open with a rock".

Truly, this writer has suffered for his art, and has produced entertainment far greater than that which he has reviewed.

[identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com 2008-02-19 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
For some reason, despite being near impossible to phase in most other ways, unmoved by the heaviest of BDSM, vorephilia or bestiality, and being fascinated by images of extreme body modification, horrific wounds, nasty disfigurements, etc etc, there's just something about coprophilia and ... whatever the equivalent is involving urine... that I just don't want to deal with on any level, not even in a can't-not-look way.

This might be seen as particularly curious given my complete comfort with and indeed active enjoyment of every other aspect of the human body and the various fluids it produces (even menstrual blood and semen, though not my favouritest things, don't particularly bother me).

Oh, except vomit. But if there's a fetish involving vomit, I just don't want to know.

God, there is, isn't there? There must be. I so wish I hadn't even thought of that.
Edited 2008-02-19 00:40 (UTC)

[identity profile] pickwick.livejournal.com 2008-02-19 12:44 am (UTC)(link)
I skimmed bits of the article because it was a bit flowery, but the last page morbidly fascinated me enough to click the links. Only the last two were at all disturbing, and even then it looked more like chocolate body paint..I suspect the video would be significantly ickier.

[identity profile] lilitufire.livejournal.com 2008-02-19 05:31 am (UTC)(link)
Well, when I say read page 4, I skipped the video description, because there's only so much I want to know about a video of poo porn, but did laugh at the review summary at the end. :)

[identity profile] figg.livejournal.com 2008-02-19 08:18 am (UTC)(link)
Just so you know, it's the same production company behind swap.avi and 2girls1cup.

[identity profile] poisonduk.livejournal.com 2008-02-19 08:21 am (UTC)(link)
I used to whole-heartedly and naively click on everything as I thought it was all of interest to someone, however a certain friend of yours stopped that after his posting a few weeks ago warning me not to search for a term on google, which despite his warnings in flashing lights, with big Stars and Neon appendages screaming 'Yes Jackie, just don't do it'. I now no longer do something out of interest....

[identity profile] martling.livejournal.com 2008-02-19 10:38 am (UTC)(link)
I read up to the start of page 4, then skipped the blow-by-blow once the shitting started and jumped to the commentary at the end.

Because I have been on the internet long enough to know that there are things to wish you hadn't seen. So I have yet to see this, or 2girls1cup, and intend to keep it that way.