andrewducker: (bubble)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2006-09-11 08:10 am

*sigh*

Now been defriended by [livejournal.com profile] prynne, which I guess solves the problem. Shame though, as I liked a lot of her writing, and we occasionally chatted over Yahoo in an enjoyable way.

I mean, the ideal solution to "I do not like your speech." is to then remove yourself from it, but that doesn't stop me wishing there was a way of fixing it.

*insert amateur psychological analysis of why I don't like to lose friends here*

(oh, and it took me about 45 seconds of scanning my icon list to find one I couldn't misinterpret in some way as being somehow a dig, offensive or otherwise unsuitable)

[identity profile] spaj.livejournal.com 2006-09-11 06:56 pm (UTC)(link)
While what he says (hi) is absolutely correct, the tone of his post (hi, I don't know you, so you're third person) points the blame at you.

This is your Journal. You don't have a duty to post nice things. If all you did was post pictures of kittens, you'd be in a kitten-posting community where everyone loved everyone, and no one's was intellectually stimulated (offensive to kitten-posters. Tough!)

Equally, she (the cats mother) doesn't have an obligation to like what you say or agree with it.

I should say that you've been through this before Andy, in a number of guises. I would be very strongly sticking to my guns over it, but that's me. You're questioning the world whether you're wrong. But one of the things I've learned from you is quite specifically that morals are completely subjective.

Got to go kill some terrorists.

Adam

[identity profile] kurosau.livejournal.com 2006-09-12 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
Actually, I'm not really blaming him for anything. I'm just trying to point out that assuming that someone will understand the tone of your post doesn't work.