[identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com 2006-05-20 04:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd rather having something good than nothing. But I'd rather have nothing than more of the same. "Doing it right" doesn't concern me, regardless of the source material.

[identity profile] laserboy.livejournal.com 2006-05-20 06:31 pm (UTC)(link)
"Doing it right" doesn't concern me, regardless of the source material.

I agree. As long as what we get entertains me. The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen film is a good example.

[identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com 2006-05-20 06:58 pm (UTC)(link)
It's a shame, since there's often a massive (well, massive in terms of internet fanboys) outcry that people are even daring to film something.... To heck with them. A film or TV show of something is always going to be different.

Rumours of a Blue Beetle TV show (if there was such a thing, it's just an example - keep it in your pants) would make me go "ooh"... I'd then wait to see what kind of thing they were doing with it (sci-fi action, dark and broody loner in gritty streets, teen drama, comedy claymation etc) before going "sweet jeebus, not another of those..." ;-)

[identity profile] laserboy.livejournal.com 2006-05-20 07:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Indeed. I agree, but not in the specific case of a Green Lantern film starring Jack Black as Kyle Rayner. A world of "NO!" :)

[identity profile] trav28.livejournal.com 2006-05-20 04:45 pm (UTC)(link)
I stand by my previous comments - why have hamburger when you can have fillet steak?

[identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com 2006-05-20 04:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Actually, I'd like steak too.

[identity profile] trav28.livejournal.com 2006-05-20 05:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Only if it's an authentic steak and given the ok by the original artists/cow/publishing house/writers ;)

[identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com 2006-05-20 05:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, Alan Moore is really annoyed when he orders steak, and then it turns up and he finds out that they've added a sauce... and it's quite nice sauce (a bit peppery, a bit of brandy in it maybe)..and even Kevin O'Neill likes the sauce, but goddamit, he didn't WANT sauce...

[identity profile] trav28.livejournal.com 2006-05-20 05:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Sauce is bad...anarchy good ;)

[identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com 2006-05-20 05:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Damn, I want to live where you live, if you can go to a restaurant and get steak with anarchy.

[identity profile] trav28.livejournal.com 2006-05-20 05:10 pm (UTC)(link)
We have anarachic steaks here in B'ham. Whatever you do - do not ask for it to be rare ;)

I prefer Balti, me!

[identity profile] trav28.livejournal.com 2006-05-20 04:49 pm (UTC)(link)
*grins*

Sorry, was cribbing Paul Newman (I think?) there ;)

[identity profile] wolflady26.livejournal.com 2006-05-20 05:00 pm (UTC)(link)
I think television is full of crappy shows already. Anything that isn't really good should be left alone.

[identity profile] surliminal.livejournal.com 2006-05-20 05:26 pm (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't usually agree but I do in the specific case of bad superhero adaptations! But of cousre who knows what's "getting it right"? We both really liked V for Vendetta but some people would no doubt rather it had never been made..

[identity profile] communicator.livejournal.com 2006-05-20 07:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah. In everything else, something is better than nothing. In the unique case of comic book adaptations, the reverse is the case.

[identity profile] laserboy.livejournal.com 2006-05-20 06:35 pm (UTC)(link)
"I'd rather have something than nothing"...

.. wasn't what I was saying at all. I know you were using that to lead to another discussion but I just feel the need to clarify that. ;-)

[identity profile] kurosau.livejournal.com 2006-05-20 08:31 pm (UTC)(link)
If they can't do it right, I'd like a cool looking trailer rather than nothing. That's my option #3.

[identity profile] thishardenedarm.livejournal.com 2006-05-20 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)
the first option kind of doesnt work because at the begining of the act of adaptation there is surely a presumption of success, of getting it kind of right. Unless that they _know_ its going to come out wrong, but the proceed anyway in bad faith, in which case option one would be "if they are cynically intending to do it wrong, they shouldnt do it at all", which no-one could disagree with.

The only other way this statement could parse is if it means something like "adaptations shouldnt be done by people who are delusionally convinced they are getting it right, when they are clearly not". Again, a no-brainer.

I cant belive i've got drawn into this, I must go and wash myself in Henry James. I'm on The Golden Bowl now, his famously convoluted last novel. Its like an amazing workout for the psyche; like having your intellectual sphincter stretched by a particularly impressive instrument. That will be the sound of no-one caring.