andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2005-11-25 08:15 am

Responsibility

This is inspired by the comment here, where [livejournal.com profile] ladysysiphus says "If you have consumed enough alcohol to impair your judgement, I believe you then have to take at least some responsibility for putting yourself in a position where something like this might happen."

[Poll #619684]

[identity profile] hawkida.livejournal.com 2005-11-25 08:43 am (UTC)(link)
Interesting...

I've answered on the grounds that I think responsibility for violence lies with the perpetrator where they are conscious and decision-making. Tigers and bricks aren't so. But it does make me think... I would say all of these cases are about risk assessment and bad luck rather but have trouble matching this with "to blame" or "responsible" in a consistent way.

[identity profile] cangetmad.livejournal.com 2005-11-25 09:39 am (UTC)(link)
Consciousness, in the case of the tiger, is only partly the point - the rest is morality. Why should the tiger care about you as anything other than food?