andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2005-07-27 09:06 am
Entry tags:

Days Off?

Not sure how I feel about this.  A Christian lost his court case where he claims he was sacked for refusing to work Sundays.  His employers moved to a 7-days shift system and required people to work every day of the week (I assume week on/week off).

On the one hand, if they're discriminating equally against Christians, Muslims, Jews, etc. then it's hard to say that they're practising religious discrimination.  And it's not like I actually agree that there's any _rational_ reason for not working on a Sunday.

I suspect I'm feeling the left-over twinge from when working on a Sunday used to be extremely rare.  If, after all, a sect sprang up that forbade working on Wednesdays I wouldn't expect employers to automatically give people the Wednesday off.  And it's not like we're actually a Christian country any more - church attendance is down to 7.5%.

Dammit, it's my Englishness coming to the fore.  Must...suppress....

[identity profile] xquiq.livejournal.com 2005-07-27 12:56 pm (UTC)(link)
This comment makes the wholly erroneous assumption that Christmas is in any way a Christian religious festival in the UK.

'Wholly' erroneous? For some people, Christmas is a predominently a religious period, although these people are reducing in number.

I firmly believe that becoming a parent is a choice like any other. Yes, it is in our interests for employers to make it easier for parents to work, but I don't think 'because I'm a parent' should automatically trump all other reasons for increased flexibility. Sadly, it's something I've seen a fair bit of.

I would hope that an employer would help parents ensure that they can take holiday at convenient times. I would equally hope that an employer would be understanding of the commitments of non-parents (eg. sick relatives, moving house, restrictions on a spouse's holiday periods). I've seen a lot of emphasis on the former and not a great deal on the latter.