andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2005-03-06 01:24 pm

Discovery

Having realised that life is just too damn short I have switched to reading Slashdot at 3. Suddenly the world seems a happier, shinier place. If only life had a similar function.

Brief explanation - comments on Slashdot are rated by other users (moderated up or down). They start at 0 (for anonymous people) 1 (for people with accounts) and 2 (for people who have been moderated up enough times to be considered trustworthy) and then can be moderated up as far as 5. Reading at 0 is akin to plunging your head repeatedly into a large bucket full of particularly stupid squid, reading at 2 means that you get to read everything that anyone at all thinks is a vaguely sensible thing to say, reading at 5 means you never get to see discussion, just statements, 3 seems to be a reasonable compromise. What I'd really like is for it to set it to a level that gives me the top-rated 50-ish comments, but that would be far too sensible.

[identity profile] lilitufire.livejournal.com 2005-03-06 01:28 pm (UTC)(link)
I like that system.

I'm curious - how is it possible to get a -1?

[identity profile] sbisson.livejournal.com 2005-03-06 01:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah - that helps.

Good on you for the tip!
drplokta: (Default)

[personal profile] drplokta 2005-03-06 01:57 pm (UTC)(link)
+1 Informative

[identity profile] themongkey.livejournal.com 2005-03-06 02:46 pm (UTC)(link)
You could always switch to not reading it at all.

[identity profile] azalemeth.livejournal.com 2005-03-06 04:34 pm (UTC)(link)
I read at -1 ^_^.

Now that *is* like washing your hair in sodium hydroxide. I have it like that mainly as I get so many blasted modpoints....meta-modding is much more fun.

For a moment I thought you mean /. at 3pm!

[identity profile] terminalmalaise.livejournal.com 2005-03-06 04:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Life is too damn short. I switched to AlterSlash and only hop over to Slashdot if it's something that really interests me. There's no reason someone couldn't make a version that screen-scraped the top 50 instead of just the top 5...

[identity profile] cruft.livejournal.com 2005-03-06 08:01 pm (UTC)(link)
I started reading at 6 and had to strangle like 100000 fewer people per day because of it! yay!

[identity profile] whumpdotcom.livejournal.com 2005-03-06 08:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Anita Rowland says she reads it at 5.

I don't read it.

Now if I can figure out how to keep wingnuts from using Blogger...

[identity profile] heron61.livejournal.com 2005-03-07 08:34 am (UTC)(link)
Reading at 0 is akin to plunging your head repeatedly into a large bucket full of particularly stupid squid

That is one of the best (and most vivid) statements of what far too much of the internet is like.