andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2004-01-19 08:38 am

Any USA experts care to enlighten me?

What's the difference between the Senate and the House of Representatives?

This West Wing watcher would like to feel slightly less confused about how your government works...

[identity profile] substitute.livejournal.com 2004-01-19 12:47 am (UTC)(link)
The Senate, the upper house, has two members from each state.

The House of Representatives has a varying number of representatives per state depending on the state's population. This is the "lower" house.

Each house has particular privileges and restrictions. Laws must pass through both houses and be signed by the President.

The idea is that the more populous states have more influence in the House, but all states are represented equally in the Senate as a balance against the tyranny of the majority. This means that a large state like California has more votes in the lower house. However, a senator from Maine is equal to a Californian senator.

There are other quirks that favor the House of Representatives in tax bills, etc., to fine tune this system.

[identity profile] rahaeli.livejournal.com 2004-01-19 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
Each state gets two senators, and a number of representatives that depends on the population. It was a compromise, back when the constitution was being written -- half the states thought that all states should get equal representation, and the other half thought that the bigger states should get more pull. So, compromise! Let's do BOTH!

And, you know, I'd write out a long thing about what they do and what roles they play and etc, but Google found me one.

And, of course, the cynical and politically jaded answer is "The difference between the Senate and the House is that senators take six years to get rid of, and representatives only take two."

[identity profile] derumi.livejournal.com 2004-01-19 04:49 am (UTC)(link)
There are less fools in the Senate.

[identity profile] onceupon.livejournal.com 2004-01-19 06:07 am (UTC)(link)
I was going to comment, but the previous posters pretty well covered it.

Hello!

[identity profile] aberbotimue.livejournal.com 2004-01-19 06:47 am (UTC)(link)
Its a fantastic show isn't it!

[identity profile] sinpar.livejournal.com 2004-01-19 08:42 am (UTC)(link)
What hasn't been mentioned that I've noticed is that both houses must pass a law before it is sent to the executive branch for signature. With the senate, every single state has an equal voice in the vote (it's that checks and balances thing that the founding fathers were so into)

the structure may be found here (http://bensguide.gpo.gov/files/gov_chart.pdf) in excrutiating detail

Or here (http://bensguide.gpo.gov/3-5/government/branches.html) for good general explanations that explain things better than I can (Yeah, it's a kid's site but it's accurate). I have such trouble getting past my own cynical views of my government that it's difficult to explain it to others without inserting bias.

[identity profile] terminalmalaise.livejournal.com 2004-01-19 10:53 am (UTC)(link)
In theory, Congressmen/Representatives are more responsive to the needs and desires of the people of their specific district (the small slice of the state they represent), whereas Senators are concerned with the state as a whole.

Congressmen are lower in the food chain in general, though their influence will vary depending on where they're from, how active they are in the party, what committees they happen to sit on/chair and any other factors that might give them a lot of influence.

For the politically ambitious, it's just a stepping stone that many skip (Hillary Clinton for instance); Presidents are most often former Governors or Senators.

Your average American might know who their state Senators are, are somewhat less likely to know their local Congressman by name, and are pretty unlikely to know any other Representatives from their state (or at least that's my sense).

Re: Senators vs. Representatives

[identity profile] wolfieboy.livejournal.com 2004-01-19 11:18 am (UTC)(link)
Originally, the Senate were to be the elite and educated while the House was to represent the common people. This can be seen somewhat in the powers that each has. This distinction has mostly been lost though and most of what's possible has been laid out by the other commentors.

A finer point

[identity profile] bibliofile.livejournal.com 2004-01-23 08:03 am (UTC)(link)
Legislation can originate only in Congress; the President technically has the power only to sign or veto. Some types of legislation must originate in either the House or the Senate, but I can't remember which types -- and I don't remember TWW as noting that specifically.