bens_dad: (Default)

[personal profile] bens_dad 2025-10-06 12:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Network rather than storage; the story I heard was that some time (last century, I believe) Cambridge had problems with the link to JaNET, the nation university network and eventually achieved redundant links with two different suppliers.

A JCB (backhoe?) managed to break both links, because the two suppliers were using the same trench !

The entertaining part was that the break was in Bury-St-Edmunds, tens of miles in the wrong direction from the direct route.
bens_dad: (Default)

[personal profile] bens_dad 2025-10-06 04:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I didn't get to ask that.

I don't know the telecom map of the UK, but I wonder whether the BT research labs at Martlesham Heath, Ipswich are relevant ?
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)

[personal profile] redbird 2025-10-06 06:13 pm (UTC)(link)
After the 9/11 attacks, it was discovered that some computer communication systems that should have been triply-redundant, from different suppliers, all used cables that went under the World Trade Center. I think that was a combination of the people who paid for that should-be-redundant system not having checked that companies A, B, and C weren't using any shared cables (possibly owned by D), and not having checked the physical locations of the cables.


bens_dad: (Default)

[personal profile] bens_dad 2025-10-06 08:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah, the reverse of the 1996 Manchester bombing.

Some servers in buildings demolished by the bomb were still running and there was a rush to copy the data before the emergency services switched the power off.