juan_gandhi: (Default)

[personal profile] juan_gandhi 2025-08-06 12:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you. Good stuff, pretty informative.
calimac: (Default)

[personal profile] calimac 2025-08-06 12:54 pm (UTC)(link)
3) Peter Kyle's offensive comment is an example of how supporters of measures disbelieve in disagreement over tactics - the question of whether the measure will achieve its goal. Instead, they read all disagreements as over the basic goals - despite that reading not making any sense.

4) It was a half century ago that I took courses in genetics and molecular biology, and I learned way back then that biology is messy, and that the notion that humanity is divided into two neat little boxes labeled M and F, is a fallacy.

5) I haven't encountered anybody advocating extinction as described here, but I did once know a man who was looking forward with pleasure to the idea of uploading his consciousness into a machine. But he suddenly died young, and if he'd known how fragile his physical envelope was, that might explain his attitude.
channelpenguin: (Default)

5.

[personal profile] channelpenguin 2025-08-06 02:24 pm (UTC)(link)
I never really cared about the long term survival of humanity. I am pretty sure the planet will host some sorts of life until the sun goes boom. I am also pretty sure that there are untold numbers of other lifeforms on other planets (and in other types of places out there too maybe).

But my views are not like any of those mentioned.

Those do seem to me to be like religion, suffering here on Earth is irrelevant it is your immortal engrams uploaded into *whatever* that matter (or we are all damned and deserve to die out). So it just gets filed in my brain under "total bollocks" the same way. Of course 1) it is a subject of scientific curiousity as to the psychology / sociology that leads people to think/feel/act like that - including myself and my views noted above. 2) it could fuck things up for lots of people,animals,plants etc. in the interim. Which isn't nice Sigh.