rhythmaning: (cat)

[personal profile] rhythmaning 2025-04-11 11:24 am (UTC)(link)
I'd see them not so much as rules, more as guidelines... *ducks*
armiphlage: Ukraine (Default)

[personal profile] armiphlage 2025-04-11 11:52 am (UTC)(link)
4. How a $2,000 'Made in the USA' Phone Is Manufactured

This is exactly what my factory does (but for medical, aircraft, industrial, and satellite electronics), if you have any questions.
juan_gandhi: (Default)

[personal profile] juan_gandhi 2025-04-11 03:45 pm (UTC)(link)
#1. Good idea about the hedgehogs. Save the birds.
#2. Unbelievable! You guys can also start voting for the king, why not? Or at least let the peers choose one, like they do in Vatican.
mountainkiss: (Default)

[personal profile] mountainkiss 2025-04-11 04:13 pm (UTC)(link)
(1) easier than cats

(5) I am pretty sure that levitating bugs with sound can transform whatever the fuck they want.
bens_dad: (Default)

[personal profile] bens_dad 2025-04-11 06:59 pm (UTC)(link)
2. In theory I agree with Churchill (it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time), but in practice the hereditaries bother me far less than the commons and the politically nominated peers. The Lords Spiritual haven't made the best showing recently either. Even the great and good, appointed without any political slant, are often chosen for their ability to lead rather than their competence in their actual profession.

I have seen the hereditaries save us from the Tories when Labour failed to do so (my memory is vague but it might have been about nurses under Thatcher or Major) so I was not happy to see their influence diluted by political yes-men and women.
calimac: (Default)

[personal profile] calimac 2025-04-12 12:45 am (UTC)(link)
2) Removing the hereditaries? Introducing retirement rules? At first I wasn't sure this wasn't just a copy of an article from the last round of Lords reform nearly 30 years ago.

3) Berry's rule #2 has always made me nervous. Yes, your smartphone has replaced all those devices. And if you lose your smartphone, you've lost all those devices.
symbioid: (Default)

[personal profile] symbioid 2025-04-12 03:55 am (UTC)(link)
"Just consider this remarkable fact: Every device featured in this Radio Shack advertisement from 1991 has been replaced by your tiny phone. "

Yeah, no. I'm not typing a 1500 line BASIC program from Family Computing into my phone's keyboard.

EDIT: I wonder how much Trump played a role in the increase in iPhone. Is this a global pricing situation? I imagine to some degree, but those tarriffs in his first regime really did bump up costs (I remember how synths were cheaper, then they jumped like 20% in cost...) Then Covid. And now *waves hands*.

Then again, in 2011, we were really still recovering from the global recession (thanks US regulation (or lack thereof)), so maybe it was cheaper because of the crash; maybe also did Tim actually improve workers conditions, and did that slow production of the iCrap? But yea I'd like to see the trendlines across a variety of devices in general. Makes me wonder.
Edited 2025-04-12 04:09 (UTC)