channelpenguin: (Default)

[personal profile] channelpenguin 2024-12-31 11:55 am (UTC)(link)
Hmmm. If so, why is this not mentioned in the Wikipedia article or either of the 2 linked articles I read?

Someone, in fact many someones, must think differently, to the point of not even mentioning the similarity. I wonder why? Because plasmids are DNA fragments and obelisks RNA? Or that "The RNA sequences of obelisks are unlike any previously described and do not match the DNA or RNA of any known plant, animal, bacterium, or virus."?

It's been 30 years since I studied biology, I would have to go off and do some catch-up reading to decide if I think the structural similarity is close enough. But I do tend towards thinking that because they do have totally novel sequences, they do deserve to be thought of as a thing apart.