andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2023-11-07 12:00 pm
hairyears: Spilosoma viginica caterpillar: luxuriant white hair and a 'Dougal' face with antennae. Small, hairy, and venomous (Default)

[personal profile] hairyears 2023-11-08 10:25 am (UTC)(link)
(8) The Scottish government is staying well away from the political posturing of an extremely damaging law.

Damaging, but effective in the sense that some of the damage is advantageous to a particular Conservative agenda: bear that in mind when you hear warnings and criticisms of 'failures' that malicious actors celebrate as successes!

Meanwhile, the capped penalties for unions have a backdoor:

The maximum damages that courts can award against a union for unlawful strike action is £1m.

It wasn't fines that curtailed (but did not halt!) the activities of the National Union of Miners in the strikes of the early 1980's.

Their repeated failure to comply with the court orders led to a separate set of penalties for contempt of court, *which were and are unlimited*, backed up with asset seizures.

In theory, union officials can be imprisoned for contempt: thankfully, even the Thatcher regime stepped back from such a political disaster.

The current Westminster cabinet would delight in taking such a conflict to these extremes, and escalate it as far as their media will tolerate. Or encourage.

What would the state of politics and civic life be like, in the aftermath of the inevitable national strikes and civil disorder that would follow such folly?

Someone, somewhere in Westminster, wants that. Thankfully, Holyrood doesn't.