andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2023-11-07 12:00 pm
danieldwilliam: (Default)

2 David MacKay

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2023-11-07 01:02 pm (UTC)(link)
I was a great fan and respecter of David MacKay's work. He was suitably diligent and sceptical and also came from a place of recognising the need to decarbonise the UK's energy system.

I did always think he was too pessimistic. That he'd assumed a conservative and static technology base and a hostile public response based on cost. Not unfair assumptions at the time when he was trying to address some Polyanna-ish handwaving on the part of the renewables sector. I always took his work to come from a position of asking the renewables sector if they were sure they could deliver and if not, then the future looked like this. Which was a good and worthy challenge.

He certainly challenged me to make a better case for a renewable future. I'm sure his challenge improved the work of many people in the energy sector.

I'm also sure he would be pleased to have been wrong.