andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2023-09-14 12:00 pm
calimac: (Default)

[personal profile] calimac 2023-09-14 07:58 pm (UTC)(link)
3) Article says that there was a simple solution to the Brexit dilemma available to May, which was for the UK to leave the EU formally but stay in the single market and customs union.

That was not an option that could have been taken at the time, not according to anything I was reading about it, and I was taking in quite a lot on the topic then. Staying in the single market and customs union would have required the UK to remain under EU trade regulations, and getting out from under EU regulation was, we were repeatedly assured, the whole point of Brexit.

The article is correct that driving a customs border either between NI and the Republic, or down the Irish Sea, were the only other options, and that eventually Boris picked the last and pretended he hadn't.

Here's what I wrote at the time of Boris's actions.
calimac: (Default)

[personal profile] calimac 2023-09-15 02:07 am (UTC)(link)
That must have been a whole different group of people, because desire to get out from under EU regulations was the whole driving force of the Brexit campaigners I heard. If any of them were pushing a "stay in the Market" option, they were being completely dishonest, because this was incompatible with their anti-Brussels goals. However, dishonesty was a marker of the campaign, so there you go.

I notice that the collection you cite 1) is in response to John Redwood, who was under the same impression I was, so it's not just me; 2) most of the items fail to state specifically that staying in the Market is an option, they just don't say that it's not an option. I call that misleading at best.

At least, though, you've explained what May meant by "Brexit means Brexit." I wondered at the time, what else could it mean?