andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2023-08-16 12:00 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Interesting Links for 16-08-2023
- 1. The 16 brutal restrictions imposed on women in Afghanistan during two years of the Taliban
- (tags:taliban afghanistan women rights )
- 2. 'We want a second baby, but can't afford one': The rise of Britain's one-child families
- (tags:children money uk )
- 3. Edinburgh is new Covid hotspot as active cases double during Festival Fringe
- (tags:pandemic edinburgh festival fringe )
- 4. Positive Association between Altitude and Suicide across the USA
- (tags:usa suicide oxygen )
- 5. Council Tax Reform is Necessary — and so is Understanding
- (tags:Scotland politics tax )
- 6. Brains of teenage smokers may be different than non-smokers
- (tags:cigarettes neuroscience brain teenagers )
- 7. Google DeepMind's game-playing AI just found another way to make code faster
- (tags:ai coding software )
Edinburgh is new Covid hotspot as active cases double during Festival Fringe
Re: Edinburgh is new Covid hotspot as active cases double during Festival Fringe
Re: Edinburgh is new Covid hotspot as active cases double during Festival Fringe
Re: Edinburgh is new Covid hotspot as active cases double during Festival Fringe
Re: Edinburgh is new Covid hotspot as active cases double during Festival Fringe
Re: Edinburgh is new Covid hotspot as active cases double during Festival Fringe
link 3
On the less worrying side, the mention of "hundreds of thousands" of tourists makes me wonder about the denominator in that "cases per million people" figure. 35,000 case/550,000 people is a much higher rate than 35,000/800,000.
Yes, go back to masking indoors if you ever stopped, even if you're not at the Fringe, or in the Edinburgh area. But how much of this the virus spreading faster at the Fringe, because people are mixing with more strangers, in more crowded conditions? Are people more likely to call a doctor if traveling, who would stay home, eat chicken soup, and take the painkillers they already have if they're at home?
Re: link 3
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
#5
I do worry about the "nice old lady who bought cheap years ago" problem, because I am not quite old, nor was it quite so cheap, but an area becoming more desirable and / or rising house prices are NOT UNDER MY CONTROL and NOT PREDICTABLE BY ME. So, it seems insanely unfair that any of us could be "priced out" of our home through no fault of our own, or of our own planning, at a time of life with very little room (or energy) to increase income. A bit like the raosing of retirement ages for people already in their 50s and 60s - you simply can't meanihfully adjust investment strategies that late in the day (if you even have enough income for such a luxury).
I am NOT a Tory or anything, Gods forbid - but there is a point that "normal" "higher" income people have already paid higher taxes throughout their working life. I mean people like me, decent earned income but not in the bracket to pay pros to pull clever dodges. I dont like asset taxes, land or property. Service taxes, yeah, progressive income taxes HELL YEAH, even if that means me (which I woudl bloody well hope it does) - but the REAL big "earners" ALWAYS have too much opportunity be "tax-efficient" and wriggle out.
sigh. I dunno what the solution is. I just know I dont like an ever-increasing cost of ownership on stuff I bought decades ago - and I am very much not alone there.
Bugger, if I outlive the cat I will go love on a boat - guaranteed to depreciate mightily!!! :-)
Re: #5
Re: #5
Babies and immigration
Re: Babies and immigration
Re: Babies and immigration
6
Re: 6
4
Re: 4
Re: 4