From the link, the child photos were in the context of a discussion of a conviction of a Westerner in the Philippines. So on the assumption that the poster or the discussion was not actually supporting the rape of children (I do not follow Twitter), surely it would have been sufficient to inform the poster that he was in breach of site rules and remove the photo itself, but not tremove the discussion or ban the poster.
Their terms of service are a strict zero-tolerance for posting it, regardless of intent. The law is largely the same - it tends to be a strict liability crime, where "I was doing it for good reasons" isn't considered a defence.
(I'd have expected, at the least, a significant suspension.)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
no subject
(I'd have expected, at the least, a significant suspension.)