andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2023-07-03 12:00 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Interesting Links for 03-07-2023
- 1. Review: Godot Is A Woman
- (tags:art remix theatre review )
- 2. Neil Gaiman Good Omens Tumblr QnA Collection
- (tags:neilgaiman faq tv )
- 3. Microwaving food in plastic releases billions of nanoparticles
- (tags:plastic Doom )
- 4. When Steps met Doctor Who
- (tags:viaSwampers funny video music drwho remix )
- 5. What drives wholesale energy prices?
- (tags:electricity energy economics )
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
It isn't the same. If it's a paperback from recent decades, it's likely to have a photo from the movie on the cover.
But never mind that. It takes a distinctly unimaginative person to fail to conceive of how watching a vivid and effective movie can have an influence on your subsequent reading of the book. Andrew is not a distinctly unimaginative person, so he is uttering BS to make an unfair dig.
But never mind that. The complaint, all along, hasn't been about what the movie does to the book as a book, but to the movie's unnecessary and egregious failures in its specific capacity as an adaptation of the book. Some changes may be necessary; these were not. They were a result of Jackson's failure to understand his source material.
If people didn't keep making cheap cracks like Andrew's, it wouldn't necessary to explain all this over and over again.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Microwaving plastics
*And* storing food in same.
This deserves more than an "argh" - but all I've got left is ARGH.