andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2023-03-31 12:00 pm
rhythmaning: (Armed Forces)

[personal profile] rhythmaning 2023-03-31 11:30 am (UTC)(link)
From the Wired article on authoritarianism:

"Nearly half of Republicans say they would prefer “strong, unelected leaders” over “weak elected ones,” according to a September Axios-Ipsos poll, and around 55 percent of Republicans say defending the “traditional” way of life by force may soon become necessary. About 61 percent of Republicans don’t believe the results of the 2020 presidential election."

WTAF?!! I suggest the Democrats give strong unelected LIBERAL leaders. See how they like it then!
aldabra: (Default)

[personal profile] aldabra 2023-03-31 11:48 am (UTC)(link)
I had a letting agent who routinely threatened to evict us for mentioning repairs were needed. The landlady ended up evicting us anyway, three months before K's GCSEs, on the grounds that she had done no repairs in the twelve years we were there and the house was now falling apart. (One of the windowsills broke off in her hand.)
calimac: (Default)

[personal profile] calimac 2023-03-31 03:23 pm (UTC)(link)
7) This article is pretty good on the power struggle between Disney and DeSantis, though it glosses over an explanation of why DeSantis doesn't like Disney (perhaps it assumed that was obvious). However, it's rather confused over the King Charles III part. It's not "until England's monarchy dies out," but until 21 years after the death of the last of his descendants now living.

The idea is to create a presumably long but not endless time period, and not of pre-specified duration, and the lives of living members of a famous family are often used in perpetuity-avoiding cases because it's easy to check on whether the conditions have been fulfilled. This is actually a common legal maneuver (though what the article means by "the tactic resembled one that Republicans have used" is the tactic of stripping powers before handing them over). What's unusual is for a US case to use the British monarchy for it: my understanding is that most American cases use local celebrity families like the Kennedys or Rockefellers.
nancylebov: (green leaves)

[personal profile] nancylebov 2023-03-31 03:43 pm (UTC)(link)
2. I'm so used to fear-mongering that I was expecting remote work to have a negative effect on family formation, but it actually encourages family formation.

Also, the headline was very unclear-- I think it's about early research, but I had no idea if it meant early in the day or early in life or what.

9. I think I've seen the open shell thing decades ago, but I remember it as a smallish window rather than cutting off the whole top of the shell.



hairyears: Spilosoma viginica caterpillar: luxuriant white hair and a 'Dougal' face with antennae. Small, hairy, and venomous (Default)

[personal profile] hairyears 2023-04-01 08:28 am (UTC)(link)
8: Tony is a well-known figure in London Fandom, and a magnificent raconteur: I would thoroughly recommend his tours and talks!
bens_dad: (Default)

[personal profile] bens_dad 2023-04-01 09:29 am (UTC)(link)
2. Is it usual for "fertility" to mean number of babies a woman has or will have, rather than a measure of ability to conceive ?

[personal profile] drswirly 2023-04-02 09:54 am (UTC)(link)
I was confused and then disappointed by "A Greek and Roman Mythology Walk around London", because I had snoozily parsed the title as in "An Englishman and a Scotsman go into a pub".

I was hoping to read about a pair of mythologies walking around London.