andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2022-12-08 12:00 pm
hairyears: Spilosoma viginica caterpillar: luxuriant white hair and a 'Dougal' face with antennae. Small, hairy, and venomous (Default)

[personal profile] hairyears 2022-12-09 07:39 am (UTC)(link)
And the follow-on question...

Are we actually capable,, as a society and a country, of expressing a reaction of mass revulsion?

This demands something even stronger than the 'RNLI moment', when the criminalisation of lifeboatmen by psychopathic racists in the Cabinet triggered a moderately-sized public backlash, and resulted in a surge of donations to the Royal National Lifeboats Institution.

But... There's no liberal media outlet who will support this backlash, here, even for the Samaritans.


Edited (Spelling, corrected a poor word choice) 2022-12-09 07:41 (UTC)
cmcmck: (Default)

[personal profile] cmcmck 2022-12-09 01:46 pm (UTC)(link)
There might have once been the Guardian, but they chose to believe that being transphobic sells papers, so.............
hairyears: The ridiculouslly-disorganised and multicoloured hair disaster of the Milkweed Tussock moth: small, hairy, and venomous (Milkweed Tussock Moth)

[personal profile] hairyears 2022-12-09 03:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I think you know my views on the Guardian.

If you're ever on Twitter, you will have seen the view that I expressed on that, retweeted and copied and repeatedly quoted-by-reflex by people who see it the same way I do.

I was astonished to see that it was circulating on Mastodon before I went there a month ago.

And...

It's not about selling papers, it's worse than that: it's the patient and pathological 'capture' of a culture, and people choosing not to care that they were knowingly being subverted and corrupted; and The Guardian are the way they are now, because that's the people that they want to be.