calimac: (Default)

[personal profile] calimac 2022-12-07 04:27 pm (UTC)(link)
1) Much of this was too technical for me to understand - I'd like a survey of this problem intended for lay readers - but three cheers for the writer deciding to put this on a blog instead of dividing it up into Twitter posts, of which this would take dozens.

3) Are medical records, as traditionally defined, immune from the sort of invasive discovery motion that sent this therapist to jail? If so, the solution should be to formally classify therapy records as medical.

5) The article mentions micro-trash, but I wonder where the large and visible pieces of trash are coming from, as I've read assurances that everything is broken down into micro-size by the time it gets into the infamous gyres.

6) I now feel I know less about whether there are actually things called "elephant eggs," whatever might produce them, than I did before reading this. Which was nothing.

8) A continually updating site like this will be useful for us, despite having aged out of any personal concern with abortion, given a disinclination to travel to states where women are endangered.
bens_dad: (Default)

[personal profile] bens_dad 2022-12-07 05:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, technically an elephants *does* have eggs. It is just that they are naturally only found between her ovaries and her uterus. Once fertilized they become zygotes and then embryos ...

Which doesn't help, but proves that truth and nonsense can and do overlap.