Interesting Links for 19-07-2022

[andrewducker]

1. Forests Now Cover 2% of Iceland (up 6x since 1990)

(tags:iceland forests )

2. A new milestone in augmented reality: Functional contact lenses

(tags:augmentedreality contact_lenses Technology impressive )

3. Want to be an artist? Having millionaire parents *really* helps!

(tags:wealth inequality art )

4. Keir Starmer rules out 'any agreement' with the Lib Dems after next election

(tags:labour libdem OhForFucksSake )

5. Mint is not a necessary part of toothpaste. If you don't like it then feel free to use other flavours

(tags:teeth health )

6. The future of sports: Revealed!

(tags:sports technology funny video )

7. Ballet imposes gender roles on dancers

(tags:gender dance ballet )

8. Audiobooks or Reading? To Our Brains, It Doesn't Matter

(tags:reading audio brains psychology books )

9. Stray, a game where you play as a cat in a world populated by robots is clearly not going to make any money at all

(tags:games cats review video )

10. Scientists design contraceptives to limit grey squirrels

(tags:squirrel UK contraceptive fertility )

11. Cheese reduces the risk of type 2 diabetes, heart failure, coronary heart disease, hypertension, and ischemic stroke

(tags:cheese health heart diabetes )

12. Heat wave kills more than 1,100 people in Spain and Portugal

(tags:heat globalwarming death spain portugal )

13. UK set to have world's biggest automated drone superhighway

(tags:drone uk )

Comments

[andrewducker]

It's a good thing that politicians can't be held legally responsible for the lies they tell!

[bens_dad]

!

The Advertising Standards Authority has no jurisdiction over political adverts either :-(

[danieldwilliam]

Serious question, how would you legislate for and regulate politicians not lying?

[andrewducker]

Regulating lying is going to be tricky in any case. But we manage it at least tolerably well in fraud cases. I think the tricky bits are (a) did the person knowingly lie and (b) was the effect material to their election. If so, then having a method to trigger a re-election would seem reasonable. The main issue there being the cost, and not allowing people to trigger constant elections on a weekly basis.So I think you'd need a jury to decide the facts of (a) and (b), and then put it out to the electorate to decide if they still want to be represented by the person based on that. Of course, this all needs to be balanced against the issue of, generally, this is just a single representative out of hundreds, and their impact in the grand scheme of things is minimal.

More important is the regulation of lying to parliament. Where there are processes to deal with it, and it seems that Johnson would eventually have faced the Privileges Committee. I'd like to see this toughened up somewhat, and set up so that it can work speedily. It looks like the report won't be finished until the end of the year, and while I'd like things to be thorough, they can be so while also being efficient.