dewline: Text - "On the DEWLine" (Default)

[personal profile] dewline 2022-05-28 12:56 pm (UTC)(link)
1. Telegraphing the confession...and it worries me how the reaction to this is so "all over the bloody place".

2. I wish my party to have all those things at the same time. Right bloody now, because of the provincial election still underway.

4. Some things to keep in mind there, yes.

5. Good to see Musk investigated.
Edited 2022-05-28 20:00 (UTC)
calimac: (Default)

[personal profile] calimac 2022-05-28 03:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Suspicion that many of the people who responded to "Who do you think is a genuinely great artist whose influence has been largely for the worse?" with "Warhol" didn't notice the "genuinely great artist" part. It's not whether Warhol is a genuinely great artist or not, but that they don't seem to think he is. Same goes for the person who named Kerouac.

My own theory of Warhol is that his work is primarily goofy: it's intended to be fun, to arouse laughter. That may or may not be great, but if you don't get the point, then attempts to do the same thing will come out horribly wrong, so yes, his influence is entirely bad.
skington: (huh)

[personal profile] skington 2022-05-30 01:56 am (UTC)(link)
"The only way you become a big enough party to be the obvious choice is by having an energised activist base" needs to explain Emmanuel Macron.