danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2021-07-19 10:48 am (UTC)(link)
That's a big increase in lithium production compared to current demand but I think a drop in the ocean (sorry, I'm so, so, so sorry) compared to future global demand I think.

We currently require lithium for 100% of smart phone and laptop batteries, about 1% of automotive transport and 1% of electricity storage. By 2030 that going to look more like 200% of smart phones etc, 10% of automotive transport and 5%* of electricity storage and growing.

I think the CTC scheme uses the same technology as the lithium mines in Cornwall - but bigger and with a better resource. So that's extracting water laden with salts from fissures in the rock, stripping out minerals and the heat and re-injecting the water rather than processing the surface water from the Salton Sea - which would be like the seawater extraction methods you linked to not so long ago.

Looking at the CTC website they look like they are gearing up for quite a large geo-thermal energy scheme in the end. Ironically this may reduce demand for the lithium slightly by reducing overall energy storage requirements or maybe not. I don't understand California's winter to summer electricity demand changes that well.


*totes guessing on this but given that lithium-ion batteries are not great for bulk storage of electricity I think we'll see alternative batteries used more and more use of hydro-schemes and CAES and more use of Costa Rica as a storage system. Therefore less lithium-ion batteries in use on the grid than current activity might suggest.