andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2021-02-21 07:30 pm

I've found the stupidest political take

One of the many Conservative subgroups has decided that it's wrong that Carrie Symonds (Johnson's fiance) has any input into his political decisions, because she's not elected.

Now, she may be giving him advice they disagree with. She may even be giving him terrible advice. But the idea that he shouldn't be talking to his fiance about the decisions he's making because she's not elected is just ludicrous.

Is he not allowed to get ideas from books which aren't written by sitting MPs? Is he not allowed to talk to external experts who aren't elected? Not allowed to talk to members of the public in case he listens to them before they're voted on?

He's an MP. He gets to vote on laws. And he gets to listen to, and learn from, whoever he deems appropriate. If someone doesn't like the opinions he takes on, and the decisions he makes, that's fine. We can totally judge him for that. If someone thinks that he associates with awful people and judges him for that, then that's also fair enough. But the idea that he shouldn't listen to anyone unless they've been elected is beyond laughable.
lilysea: Serious (Default)

[personal profile] lilysea 2021-02-22 09:02 am (UTC)(link)
Unless people are offering Carrie Symonds or her friends/family members money or jobs in exchange
for her influencing Johnson, I really don't see any issue/any problem.

danieldwilliam: (Default)

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2021-02-22 10:30 am (UTC)(link)
I do wonder if that might be part of the issue in the background.