andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2020-12-10 12:00 pm
claudeb: A white cat in purple wizard robe and hat, carrying a staff with a pawprint symbol. (Default)

[personal profile] claudeb 2020-12-10 03:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Too bad you can't put those numbers into balance because we're talking human lives. And what about the much bigger cost of people losing their confidence in vaccines, when it's already tenuous to begin with?
claudeb: A white cat in purple wizard robe and hat, carrying a staff with a pawprint symbol. (Default)

[personal profile] claudeb 2020-12-10 04:18 pm (UTC)(link)
No, you don't. You help as many people as you can, as much as you can, no matter who they are. You don't do math with lives. Not ever, regardless of circumstances.

[personal profile] anna_wing 2020-12-11 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
Governments, societies and individuals do the maths with lives all the time. Wants are infinite, resources are finite, aespecially in the health-care context. Your health care authorities are making decisions all the time as to how to assign them, ideally for maximum overall social benefit, rather than say, for individual private profit.

One hopes that the WHO will approve a range of vaccines, so you might have a choice of different ones eventually. I believe some of the Chinese ones are made by traditional vaccine technology - denatured or killed vaccines made in eggs, that sort of thing, so there wouldn't be the additional element of novel technology, if that is your principal concern.