andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2019-11-01 12:21 pm
naath: (Default)

[personal profile] naath 2019-11-01 02:26 pm (UTC)(link)
So
a)biking is easier than walking; I have MS, can barely walk half a mile, bike everywhere. Yes I bike slower than many people run, but I don't care.
b)'old' and 'disabled' are not the same think; at 36 I can barely walk, at 80 some people run marathons.
c)even in a population that has a lot of old people it still has some young people.

But yes, we need accessible transport too; but getting fit healthy people out of their cars might decrease traffic enough that the busses run on time and pedestrians can breathe, which would be nice for just about everyone. (also busses should... suck less)

(I'm not in NYC, I'm in Cambridge UK)
franklanguage: My cat in a box (Tripod in box)

[personal profile] franklanguage 2019-11-03 04:20 pm (UTC)(link)
This is great to know, and I agree; if NYC traffic weren't so insane, I'd be cycling—especially now that there has been a bike-share program in place for a few years. (Otherwise, if you "own" a bike, you have to accept that it will be stolen at some point, no matter how good the lock; bike thieves usually take a bike, then lock the lock right back on the pole or post it was chained to.)
naath: (Default)

[personal profile] naath 2019-11-03 05:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Cambridge is also bad for bike theft, I have insurance, which is costly, and a pricey lock (which the insurance demanded). And keep my bike inside at home, which is me being privileged to own enough space to do so.

Cambridge (UK) is a geed cycling city; less because it has infastructure though, more that so MANY people cycle that we have good cyclin lobby groups (it's nothing like as good as in the Netherlands). It is also small and flat.