andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2019-10-26 01:57 pm
ninetydegrees: Art & Text: heart with aroace colors, "you are loved" (Default)

[personal profile] ninetydegrees 2019-10-26 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)
=>Trying to Plant a Trillion Trees Won't Solve Anything

Several things I learned through various documentaries about scientific experiments and people's reports (and I apologize for my very approximate recounting and lack of scientific knowledge and references):
1) Like [personal profile] malobukov said we need to cut trees more selectively and give them time to grow. One guy had a PEFC plot of land and nothing would grow on it anymore because cutting young trees and replanting new ones was progressively killing the soil (there was no time for a give and take to really take place and no real ecosystem because it was all the same essence of trees and little else).
2) Planting trees (and other things) in areas which had become arid because, again, the soil was "dead" works (in one case, it was an area which had been repeatedly trampled by cattle, which we now tend to keep in the same field instead of moving them from one pasture to another). It progressively brought back all kinds of flora and fauna.
3) We also killed forests (and still do in some areas) to make space for intensive monoculture. We know this progressively kills soils too, makes food less rich in nutrients in turn, blahblahblah, soil which we then pollute with fertilizers and other chemicals. Making space for trees is also making less space for monoculture, urban expansion,...

So no, planting trees isn't THE solution to saving the planet. Of course not. I don't think anybody with common sense believes this. But it's A solution that can work for certain purposes in certain areas providing we change other things as well and it's part of a whole process.
Edited 2019-10-26 21:38 (UTC)