cmcmck: (Default)

[personal profile] cmcmck 2019-10-02 12:49 pm (UTC)(link)
OFFS!

I'm plain common or garden veggie and I wouldn't eat oysters as they're a form of animal protein.

Breed sheep or whatever without faces and that makes them okay to eat?

Oy gevalt!

Why do people insist on tying themselves up in such moral knots?
frith: Violet unicorn cartoon pony with a blue mane (FIM Twilight vexed)

[personal profile] frith 2019-10-02 12:50 pm (UTC)(link)
If oysters can't feel pain, then why do they coat the inside of their shells and the occasional grain of sand in slippery mother of pearl? Why do they close their shells?
cmcmck: (Default)

[personal profile] cmcmck 2019-10-02 12:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes!

It's the same kind of perverted thinking that says it's okay to boil a lobster live and they sure as hell have faces and can feel pain!

Not to mention octopi who have brains of such complexity as to make our own look rather tame.

What this guy seems to mean is that they don't have a face I can anthropomorphise.
drplokta: (Default)

[personal profile] drplokta 2019-10-02 01:20 pm (UTC)(link)
If Parliament accepts the new Bexit plan, it can add a couple of lines to the Bill implementing it to repeal the conflicting legislation. If it doesn't, then obviously the problem doesn't arise. It's a non-issue (insofar as conflicting with UK law goes; obviously the fact that it conflicts with the Good Friday Agreement really is a problem).
movingfinger: (Default)

[personal profile] movingfinger 2019-10-02 03:32 pm (UTC)(link)
That judge in the .sig file ruling seems really... wrong.

I expect all legal professionals will be replacing .sig files with pictures of their cats immediately.
redbird: closeup of me drinking tea, in a friend's kitchen (Default)

[personal profile] redbird 2019-10-02 04:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I think that legislation is mostly relevant if Johnson manages a no-deal brexit by ignoring Parliament long enough. However, as far as I can tell, he can't do that without ignoring other legislation.
calimac: (Default)

[personal profile] calimac 2019-10-02 05:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Clear-minded discussion of the Problem of Susan, but your friend Andrew Rilstone was there first.
drplokta: (Default)

[personal profile] drplokta 2019-10-02 06:38 pm (UTC)(link)
But if it’s no deal, then it doesn’t matter that Boris’s proposed deal conflicts with existing law, because it will never be implemented anyway.