andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2003-08-04 02:50 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Morals
Following on from Allorin's post here, I'm intrigued as to whether peopel think that morals are principles that can be applied to situations or are situational (but you can generalise into principles) or something else...
[Poll #164321]
[Poll #164321]
no subject
Freedom of speech is often in conflict with the right for people to avoid things that upset them (as we discussed earlier with the example of gruesome anti-vivisection posters being placed where my seven year old can see them as we walk along the street).
no subject
rights being another one of those subjective things.
no subject
The message can be the same, without the offensive image. The animals rights aren't protected any more by an offensive message than they would be without one.
no subject
People are very good at ignoring things, and sometimes it takes somebody holding (for instance) a dead Ethiopian child up and saying "look at what is happening, please help us." to make a difference.
Lots more people would be vegetarian if they saw a slaughterhouse. They intellectually know that their steak is hacked off chunk of slaughtered cow, but they don't really emotionall understand what that entails.
no subject
But my kids can't vote yet, so there is no purpose in upsetting them over a situation which they have no power to change.
no subject