andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2019-03-14 02:15 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Interesting Links for 14-03-2019
- I linked to something by Jesse Singal. I won't be doing that again.
- (tags:fraud transgender lgbt OhForFucksSake )
- Online activists are silencing us, scientists say
- (tags:research abuse )
- Six positive ways drones are used
- (tags:drone Technology )
- The EU Is Telling European Leaders There Are Only Three Reasons They Should Allow Brexit To Be Delayed
- (tags:UK europe viaDanielDWilliam )
- Suicide , austerity and the Troubles
- (tags:suicide austerity history NorthernIreland )
- Dwarf Fortress coming to Steam {and itch.io) - with updates graphics
- (tags:games )
- Labour abandons support for referendum on Theresa May's deal
- (tags:UK europe labour doom )
- An old rule means Bercow could take drastic action on Brexit | Politics News | Sky News
- (tags:UK europe politics parliament )
- May loses a vote against herself in a crazed night of parliamentary drama
- (tags:politics uk )
- UK to phase out gas heating in new homes by 2025
- Electricity is about five times the cost of gas, so that's going to be painful for some.
(tags:gas heating uk globalwarming )
no subject
The EU have been really clear on this for quite some time.
And with our exit being negotiated before the future relationship is, I'm not sure what people would want to (or be able to) change in the agreement.
They aren't going to say "Yay, it's Labour negotiating, we don't need a backstop." because they totally still do until we sign up for something coherent afterwards.
no subject
There might still be a backstop implied in a temporary deal, but if Labour said "We're going for a Norway-style arrangement", it would become a technical detail only.
I think.
no subject
And yeah, the backstop could be a temporary detail in either case - it depends on the future relationship, and we have no idea what that's going to be yet.