andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2018-10-31 11:00 am

Interesting Links for 31-10-2018

danieldwilliam: (Default)

Mueller

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-11-02 02:07 pm (UTC)(link)
A couple of thoughts on the Robert Mueller fake sexual harrassment plot.

I wonder if it the target is not Robert Mueller but the concept of sexual harrassment.

If one was worried that sexual harrassment allegations would be problematic for one's own politcal tribe one might wish to de-weaponise them.

Assume that Robert Mueller has not sexually harrassed anyone and is known to be a well-mannered person. Therefore the chances that a number of false allegation would be rapidly exposed as false and discovered to be part of an orchestrated campaign to discredit him.

This in turn discredits attempts to discredit people by accusing them of sexual harrassement (or worse). With one very obvious and well known attempt at a false flag operation you can then push a narrative that all the other (real) allegations are actually part of someone else's campaign to orchestrate false accussations against prominent men.

Why might you do this? Perhaps you are worried that your tribe is more likely to be damaged by accussations of sexual harrassment because a) your tribe has more men than women, b) your tribe has more badly behaved men, c) key figures you wish to protect are known to you to be sexual harrassers, d) your tribe suffers more damage for a given level of accussation.

And if you are wrong about Robert Mueller not being a sexual harrasser then more, real allegations emerge in a Me Too cascade and you have damaged Mueller.

I dislike being this paranoid.
danieldwilliam: (Default)

Re: Mueller

[personal profile] danieldwilliam 2018-11-03 10:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Not all Republican voters are Republicans.