andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2018-07-03 12:00 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Interesting Links for 03-07-2018
- Prototype Discworld spotted in the wild
- (tags: terrypratchett turtle )
- We're Not Addicted to Smartphones, We're Addicted to Social Interaction
- (tags: psychology addiction phones socialnetworking )
- More States Opting to 'Robo-Grade' Student Essays by Computer (even though cheating is easy)
- (tags: computers essays automation teaching )
- The lost standing stones of Devon are still hiding from archaeologists
- (tags: archaeology Devon uk )
- MPs request Bank and Treasury Brexit analysis. Today. Not two fucking years ago.
- (tags: UK Europe incompetence OhForFucksSake economics )
More States Opting to 'Robo-Grade' Student Essays by Computer (even though cheating is easy)
I mean, on the one hand, *part* of learning is indeed learning to produce an essay which looks superficially good: learning to use basically correct grammar, to produce an essay of the right length, etc, is a skill that people do need, and not everyone manages. And you can easily imagine that if you automate that sort of thing, it's a lot quicker for a human to mark. Coding has taught me that: tools that automatically force everyone to indent properly leave more time for reviewing actual code.
But on the other hand, openly saying, "lets spend fifteen years learning to write a particular essay style, completely disregarding any notion of whether you have any level of understanding whatsoever" just feels awful. No wonder people don't like school :( No wonder people read news articles that say things authoritatively that are just actual nonsense :(
I guess another way of looking at it is, "schools are so underfunded teachers already don't have time to mark 'properly', we're just acknowledging it". But even then -- even if you have extremely limited teacher time to spend, surely you could do somewhat better? :(