snippy: Lego me holding book (Default)

[personal profile] snippy 2018-02-24 06:57 pm (UTC)(link)
One of the issues widely discussed in 2A circles is what happens after successful defensive gun use. The basic assumption is $10,000 in attorney fees and that's if it's a "good shoot" and they don't charge you (that is, the determination is made that it was justifiable because self defense, rather than a crime). You might still be sued for civil damages by the injured person or family. So yeah, it's a great market for liability insurance. And like any large group, they can be targeted by businesses who want their money, and usually they negotiate discounts.

[personal profile] cosmolinguist 2018-02-24 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)
I know it's a market for liability insurance. I should've been clearer that what I found icky was the way it sounds like this has been marketed. It makes it sound like shooting a person is inevitable and this seems a lot more sinister than, say, car insurance. Cars are at least useful for non-harmful purposes.
snippy: Lego me holding book (Default)

[personal profile] snippy 2018-02-24 10:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, the whole marketing thing is that we are constantly at risk from unknown people and we need GUNS and AMMO and to carry concealed (the concealed carry purse market is...weird to say the least) and to mount an easy-access gun safe above the bed (but it's nevertheless locked with something-thumb print or combination lock). It's all about making people afraid all the time, and then telling them the only cure is guns.

It's a lot like the beauty industry that way. We're all completely inadequate and yet there are easy fixes if you'll just give us your money.