mountainkiss: (Default)

[personal profile] mountainkiss 2017-12-27 02:10 pm (UTC)(link)
What stood out to you from the postnup article? Why is this one that you chose to link up?
channelpenguin: (Default)

[personal profile] channelpenguin 2017-12-28 08:27 am (UTC)(link)
Marriage is a financial contract. Those that do not understand that should not do it, nor those that do not need it.

I will never marry again, because of this. If I start a company, do all the work and my spouse none, if we divorce, he gets half PLUS can come back and ask for more if the business does better in the future! Even if it's a limited company and he is not a shareholder and has no role in the company. If I make great investments with my own money while we are living in a flat / house that I bought entirely with my own money - guess what, he gets half of both.

It make no sense to me why someone who realises this would legally marry. The only advantages are to the poorer / lower earning partner.

I did not understand until I was there, and happily my divorce was equitable and fair. I did not seek to gain any of his assets nor he mine, and I in fact left joint property (boats, car, furniture) behind.

Making non-legally-binding emotional commitments is FINE by me, just to be clear. Admirable. Supporting people *voluntarily* is fine - just keep the law out of it.