drplokta: (Default)
drplokta ([personal profile] drplokta) wrote in [personal profile] andrewducker 2017-06-30 01:02 pm (UTC)

"You need a database not a message broker" is bad advice, because a message broker is a database, albeit a fairly specialised one. Whether you want a message broker or a more traditional database really depends on which side of the CAP theorem you want to fail on. If you can tolerate consistency failures, you want a message broker. If you can tolerate availability failures, you want a database. (And of course if you can't tolerate either then you're out of luck, because you are going to have network partitions.)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting