andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2003-07-22 12:56 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Offenders to face victims
This is a fantastic idea (in certain circumstances). It should help both victims and perpetrators to move on.
People who commit crimes could avoid prosecution if they agree to face-to-face meetings with their victims and see the impact of their offences, it has been suggested.
Both victims and offenders would have to consent to taking part in the scheme with the perpetrator admitting to the offence.
Restorative justice has so far been confined largely to young offenders but will be stepped up to include more adult offenders, school bullies and anti-social hooligans.
Mr Blunkett said: "Restorative justice means victims can get an apology from their offender, but it is about more than 'saying sorry' - it provides the victim with an explanation of why the crime was committed.
"This is something a prison sentence on its own can never do and can enable victims to move on and carry on with their lives.
"It also means that for the first time offenders will be personally held to account for the crimes they have committed."
no subject
Isn't that what a prison sentence means?
Personally, I think it's an awful idea. Let me see, prison sentence or meeting with victim, as a deterant to future crime.
Apologies don't make up for a crime.
no subject
I'm not averse to punishment in addition to rehabilitation, but punishment by itself is just revenge, which doesn't make anything better.
no subject
Another element is supposed to be rehabilitation...
...which is the real problem. We are absolutely crap at rehabilitation of criminals. Instead they tend to get educated and indoctrinated into a worse kind of culture while inside.
no subject
I don't think the correction system is perfect (far from it), but it does keep criminals off the streets.
no subject
And if you've got something that has that effect, and doesn't take long periods of time to do, then you can do it without the locking people up bit at all.
Some sort of middle ground will undoubtably be reached I'm sure. I'm just glad they're experimenting with different methods to see what works.
no subject
no subject
no subject
For me, it depends on the crime. I think murderers, rapists and child molesters should never be given the chance to reintegrate with society, so for them, jail works fine. IMHO, of course. And that was sorta who I was thinking about when I read that.
If you're talking, I don't know, robbery, or assault or something, then yeah, I guess prison doesn't solve anything. I mean, I can accept that first time offenders, who's crime is relatively small (don't ask me to measure what's small, and what isn't), deserve the chance not to do it again.
Continual abusers of the system though? What do you do if someone has no interest in being part of society?