andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2012-07-20 12:00 pm

Interesting Links for 20-07-2012

[identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com 2012-07-20 11:50 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, P&P&Z didn't annoy me at all, because it was ridiculous. This pisses me off because people will read it instead of the actual texts - it's not a route to excellent literature, it's a circumvention of it, and it'll dismantle an awful lot of the points of the novels. Austen and the Brontes' works were packed with unresolved sexual tension - the plots are basically fuelled by them. This will give readers a version that by adding the shagging in, resolving that tension, will effectively castrate the book.

[identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com 2012-07-20 12:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, quite. If people are too stupid to see the sexy in Pride and Prejudice, maybe they should just stick to 50 Shades, that's all I'm sayin'.

Also it's lazy as hell on the part of the writers and that pisses me off as a person who gets irritated by people profiting from others' work.

[identity profile] snarlish.livejournal.com 2012-07-20 06:48 pm (UTC)(link)
so i see where this is going: Petrified Purple-Prose Pride And Prejudice!