andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2012-06-29 12:00 pm

Interesting Links for 29-06-2012

simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)

[personal profile] simont 2012-06-29 03:02 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not sure that fact that I really enjoyed all the books (of the ones I've read) is a good thing or not!

Yes, there is a bit of a temptation to think "Book I love! They're making a failm of it! THEY WILL SURELY MISS THE POINT OF EVERTHING AND IT WILL BE AWFUL", isn't there?

('failm' was a genuine typo there, believe it or not. But definitely one to leave in, having made it. :-)

What I found interesting, reading that list, was that I had very different reactions to the idea of forthcoming films based on two books both of which I enjoyed. Ender's Game gave me that strong feeling of "SURELY THEY WILL COCK IT UP UNBEARABLY", but Neuromancer gave me a feeling of "actually that one has some chance of coming out OK". Not sure why; those were my instant gut reactions, not based on thinking it through carefully.
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)

[personal profile] simont 2012-06-29 03:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Hm. I have seen Johnny Mnemonic, now you mention it, but had mostly put it out of my head. (And I can't really thank you for reminding me.)

But I don't know that that's necessarily the inevitable destiny of any William Gibson novel anyone tries to turn into a film! Though certainly I can't think of any faster way to wreck Neuromancer than to try to fit it into the same continuity as film-Johnny-Mnemonic.