[identity profile] danieldwilliam.livejournal.com 2012-06-11 01:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I think unanimity is too much to hope for at the moment. In 40 years time it’ll be unanimous. Maybe.

Judging by the comments I’ve seen on various articles about it there are people who genuinely believe that extending marriage to homosexual couples will cause some kind of social break down. I’ve never been exactly what the mechanism would be for the break down of society but some folk seem genuinely apprehensive.

I think a number of Labour party members come from the tradition of Christian Socialism. I wouldn’t be surprised to discover a few were strongly against extending marriage and several more were concerned that coming out in favour might lose them votes.

(I wonder if there are any elected representatives who would vote to restrict female sufferage.)

[identity profile] danieldwilliam.livejournal.com 2012-06-11 02:16 pm (UTC)(link)
I’ve never seen a picture of that.

That’s quite funny. (Although 40 years on perhaps not as much racial equality as they prophesised.)

And I guess that’s what lies at the root of some of the objections to marriage reform. That if we allow marriage between homosexual couples then it will be seen as acceptable and more people will become homosexual. Or as my granddad used to say with heavy irony – they’ll be making it compulsory next, which was his standard mockery of any slippery slope arguments he disagreed with.

[identity profile] danieldwilliam.livejournal.com 2012-06-12 11:27 am (UTC)(link)
Enjoying the photograph.

I'd book early if I were you - there's going to be a hella of a rush once those floodgates open.