andrewducker (
andrewducker) wrote2012-02-29 11:00 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
- airplanes,
- banking,
- bias,
- business,
- censorship,
- concerts,
- copyright,
- currency,
- democracy,
- egypt,
- eu,
- euro,
- europe,
- facebook,
- fraud,
- gender,
- indepdence,
- independence,
- india,
- law,
- lgbt,
- links,
- lords,
- money,
- movies,
- muppets,
- music,
- opinion,
- politics,
- polls,
- psychology,
- religion,
- scotland,
- socialnetworking,
- stress,
- technology,
- uk,
- usa
Interesting Links for 29-02-2012
- India is having a bumpy journey towards legalising homosexual relationships
- Cineworld installing vibrating seats. Would go well with porn, methinks.
- Is this the most biased opinion poll question ever asked?
- The Great Ticket Scandal - many concert tickets go directly to resellers for a huge markup bypassing fans entirely
- On Scotland being forced to join the Euro (it can't be)
- EU law will not allow Scotland to be excluded just because it's not part of the UK any more.
- Who owns The Bank Of England?
- A chance in a generation to modernise the Lords
- Key SOPA/PIPA Post Censored By Bogus DMCA Takedown Notice
- Can Scotland be independent and keep sterling?
Personally, I'm actually leaning towards having our unique currency. I suspect we'd drop by a bit, making us more competitive.
- Men and women respond differently to stress
- KLM links Facebook to seat booking, making it even easier to sit next to tall blondes. Hurrah for in-air stalking!
- Against Big Bird, The Gods Themselves Contend In Vain
- Labour set to back Lords Reform
no subject
Shared currencies and fixed currencies work when economic conditions are pretty much the same in the two economies, or when one economy is so small and so dependent upon the larger economy that lots of transactions would be carried out in the larger country's currency anyway.*
So would Scotland and England/Wales/Ulster be closely related economies with very similar conditions? Maybe at first, but after a few years of different tax policies and perhaps more importantly, oil price changes, they really wouldn't.
* Which is why some tiny Pacific Islands use the US dollar.
no subject
If we want to be export-led and manufacturing heavy then I think the gains of our own currency would outweigh that. If we want to be finance heavy then I just don't know.
no subject
no subject
no subject
*Ok, yes, probably a few million in setup costs if you're not already doing them in pounds, euros, dollars, etc.
no subject
Somewhere in here somebody has a currency exposure.
no subject
And we're not talking about setting up a currency overnight. It will take at least 5 years from any referendum to actual independence, and probably a good few more years to setup a new currency so there will be plenty of time for banks and individuals to sort themselves out.
no subject
I wonder aloud tho - if I were selling a house, with a mortgage in sterling if I'd want to be paid in sterling and not take a currency risk on the transaction. Maybe.
no subject
no subject
I was going to have to pay a charge of approximately four times the amount that I actually wanted to pay in order to pay a small cancellation charge for a German hotel booking until I managed to get my Dad (who lives in France) to pay it for me from his Euro-denominated account there.
no subject
I think the time taken for the two economies to disentangle might be quite long.
Some 60% of Scotland’s exports are to the rest of the Sterling zone. There is a lot of cross ownership of businesses.
There are inter-family transfers. Labour mobility between the the Sterling zone is likely to remain high with no language barriers, a similar culture and just general familiarity.
I’d like to see an independent Scotland hold on to Sterling for a few years and then set up the Groat, pegged to Sterling for a few years then free floating – then we can make a decision about the Euro (if it still exists as a single currency.