andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2012-01-27 11:00 am

Interesting Links for 27-01-2012

[identity profile] nancylebov.livejournal.com 2012-01-27 12:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I would say that's true about food if you're not buying for more than two people, aren't generally buying beverages, and aren't buying from anywhere far enough away that you want to consolidate shopping trips.

[identity profile] laplor.livejournal.com 2012-01-27 12:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Agreed, and sadly, mine is badly designed in that very way.

My city deliberately uses a zoning system to ensure that residential, business, retail, and industrial areas all be as separate as possible. You cannot live near where you work, nor buy food near either your home nor your job.

Then they provide bus service between the zones only on the hour, and not before 7 am nor after malls close. They can't understand why the bus system is lightly used, so the keep withdrawing routes and runs.

Lately they've been on a kick to try to reduce car/pedestrian fatalities - a problem that better urban design would have greatly prevented!

[identity profile] nancylebov.livejournal.com 2012-01-27 12:59 pm (UTC)(link)
I've got varied grocery shopping within half a mile, but if I want Whole Foods or Trader Joe's (and I generally do), I use a bicycle with large baskets, and (especially the Trader Joe's) is far enough away that I don't want to bike there (mass transit would take about as long on the average, I think, and it would be less convenient to carry things) every couple of days.

[identity profile] skreidle.livejournal.com 2012-02-01 06:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Most of the U.S. is badly designed in this way, due to commercial/residential zoning restrictions. You'll see miles of housing, then maybe some major roadways, then miles of shopping. Walking simply isn't an option. (In actual cities, or in "town centres" that are popping up here and there in the suburban areas, walking or biking can be more feasible.)