andrewducker (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
andrewducker) wrote2012-01-10 11:00 am
andrewducker) wrote2012-01-10 11:00 am
Entry tags:
- apple,
- biology,
- blackberry,
- business,
- charlesstross,
- climate,
- death,
- funny,
- future,
- globalwarming,
- government,
- health,
- iainbanks,
- independence,
- india,
- libdem,
- life,
- links,
- longevity,
- mobilephones,
- money,
- mylittlepony,
- nature,
- nokia,
- opensource,
- photography,
- planets,
- scotland,
- security,
- sex,
- shares,
- software,
- standards,
- statistics,
- technology,
- theculture,
- trains,
- twitter,
- uk
Interesting Links for 10-01-2012
- Hacked memo leaked: Apple, Nokia, RIM supplying backdoors for government interception?
- Carbon emissions will defer Ice Age
- UK Government Betrayal of Open Standards Confirmed
- National Geographic Photography Contest Winners: 2011 (The Pretty, It Burns!)
- If Twilight had been written by Iain M Banks
- My Little Pony Fleshlights. So cute!
- The 50 Funniest Tweets Of 2011 (And by 50, they mean 17, shuffled in with a bunch of mediocre or offensive ones)
- Your body wasn’t built to last: a lesson from human mortality rates
- Does Scotland get more out of the union than it puts in (money-wise)?
- Charlie Stross predicts the next 80 years
- What an honest statement from a CEO would look like
- Liberal Democrats blocked David Cameron's attempt to impose an 18-month deadline for a referendum on Scottish independence.
- Miniature Liquid Worlds
- Phase one of UK high-speed rail line gets go-ahead
Re:
I agree that companies should not base future plans on short term, quick-buck, trader sentiment, but plenty of long term investors buy and hold shares for years despite not being part of an IPO. They still own that piece of the company even if they didn't buy it immediately. The interest of share holders shouldn't be more or less served because of when they bought the shares.