I haven't. I might do in future. But if putting them in is onerous, I wouldn't miss them enormously. I tend to tag my own posts weeks later rather than as I post them, and the tags are (I imagine) mostly for my own reference.
Might be worth clarifying that you don't mean the links themselves. I read it that way at first, and there's currently one comment which suggests to me the commenter is also reading it that way.
I rarely click like them to give context - if the article title is 'why dogs have big ears' I like to have a context as to whether the article will be a scientific one, or whether it's a funny cartoon. I'll click or not on the link, depending on what I'm on the mood for.
See, I try to make the description informative enough that one doesn't have to work it out from tags, because I primarily bookmark stuff to share on Twitter. The above results do nothing to remove my request that it be an option on your reposter, though :P
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
Also note, I tend to not vote in polls, but voted in this one! :)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject