andrewducker: (Default)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2011-12-12 11:00 am
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)

[personal profile] simont 2011-12-12 01:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Sure, there's nothing wrong with silly physics done on purpose for the sake of coolness or plot dynamic. The article's complaint is that a lot of these things aren't done on purpose any more: they've become unquestioned traditions of SF-in-general, and now ships' fusion reactors blow up all the time not because a particular show has decided to adopt a counterfactual premise for the sake of the plot but just because that's what writers in general think fusion reactors do – they probably don't even realise it's a counterfactual premise.