http://danieldwilliam.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] danieldwilliam.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] andrewducker 2011-11-21 10:29 am (UTC)

See also my comments in reply to AD.

There are bound to be cases where one piece of evidence is in fact going to be sufficient but even CCTV with a clear view of someone’s face can be faked. The standard for corroboration is pretty low but I’d like some second piece of evidence so that there isn’t a single point of failure in the system.

The point of corroboration is to make it harder for the state or for a conspiracy of witnesses to gain a conviction by presenting false evidence.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting