[identity profile] gwendally.livejournal.com 2011-11-13 05:39 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not sufficiently liberal enough for WeaselKing so he hates me and will warp anything I say into justification for his hatred.

It's okay. I know his type. I hadn't noticed Torrain before and now I've noted him, too, as a person who argues from emotional hatred. I just like to know who they are so I can avoid them.

[identity profile] torrain.livejournal.com 2011-11-13 05:55 pm (UTC)(link)
*notes verifiably factual incorrect assumption you made about me and grins quietly*

Not bothering to correct, but it does tend to reinforce the behaviour pattern I've noticed in you about adhering to cultural preconceptions. ;)

[identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com 2011-11-14 04:13 am (UTC)(link)
No, please try again: You're an idiot, who's repeatedly said demonstrably idiotic things, and who regulary spouts ignorance and thinks it profound.

It's okay. I know his type.

Yeah, those dirty people with their "facts" and their "reality". I mean, they *point out* when you're *full of shit* and provide you with *links* that complete debunk your idiotic preconceptions - that's just not very white of them, is it.

Hey, have you figured out how the NHS determines which treatments are covered, or whether the USA is "at war with Osama bin Laden" yet? Inquiring minds want to know.

[identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com 2011-11-14 04:21 am (UTC)(link)
PS: When you said that intellectual rigour of the sort described by "scepticism" was unique to "anglo-saxons", what did you mean, again? Because what you SAID was that thinking was something that only white people did.

Are you claiming that you didn't understand any of the words you used, AGAIN?
Or are you claiming that your racist statements aren't REALLY racist because you're better than that, AGAIN?

I mean, really, don't leave us in suspense.

[identity profile] theweaselking.livejournal.com 2011-11-17 03:05 am (UTC)(link)
Hey! What does 'scepticism is "a point of pride if intellectual rigor is found primarily in the anglo-saxon world"' mean, again?

Come on, don't leave us in suspense, thinking that the racist dumbshit said something racist AGAIN and then said we "just didn't understand", and then stopped commenting AGAIN.

I mean, that leaves us deciding that the ignorant racist fuckwit has once again said something fuckwitted and racist and ignorant and then, ONCE AGAIN, run screaming from addressing her racist ignorant fuckwittery. And you can't want *that* to be the impression you leave in your last ever comment here, can you?