andrewducker: (Made of Love)
andrewducker ([personal profile] andrewducker) wrote2011-11-09 10:27 pm

Link Feed Templates

After much faffing around with Javascript and the like, the templating is now in.

It's not for people that don't understand code at all, but I can't see much of a way to make it simpler.

The current default template looks like this:
<ul class="links">
#foreach($link in $links)
<li class="link"><A href="$link.URL">$link.Title</A>
#if($link.Description)<BR><span class="link-description">$link.Description</span>#end
<BR><span class="link-tags">(tags:#foreach($tag in $link.Tags) <A href="$tag.TagURL">$tag.Tag</A>#end )</span>
</li>
<BR><BR>
#end
</ul>

which basically says:
  • Start a list
  • For each link in the collection of links:
    • Create a new list item and put the link title in it, and make that title a hyperlink to the URL of the link.
    • If the link has a description, then put it in, on a new line.
    • Add a new line, and then put in each tag, turning it into a hyperlink back to the site that the links came from (i.e. delicious or pinboard)
    • end the list item
  • end the list


If you're going to play around with it then use the "Test" input and output settings, so that you're not constantly scraping the source links/posting to your journal. If you completely mess it up then hit the "Reset Templates" button to restore the original template.

Next up - a template for the subject line/title.

[identity profile] momentsmusicaux.livejournal.com 2011-11-10 12:31 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, CSS will appear in the post. But BRs are even worse, as there's nothing I can do with them at all.

The best way would be to accept that LIs are the way they are, and if you want spacing on them, put CSS into your own LJ's output, ie in your LJ theme.

And really? That sort of thing gets bandied about all the time in issue queues.

[identity profile] momentsmusicaux.livejournal.com 2011-11-10 12:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh. Sorry.

For the record, I never say that sort of thing 'because I don't like the look of it'. I say these things based on experience and knowledge.

I don't see Sven's answer -- what was it?